More Insights
See all
185K+
Websites + Marketplaces Tracked
1M+
Merchants Tracked
1.2M+
of Automated Actions Initiated Monthly
2.4B+
of Data Points Tracked
Today’s brands face constant pressure to maintain price consistency, protect their reputation, and build strong reseller relationships. A MAP pricing policy helps achieve all three.But what exactly is a MAP policy? How does it differ from the manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) or a unilateral pricing policy (UPP)? And what pitfalls should you avoid when setting one up?
This guide covers the map pricing definition, the benefits of clear map policies, and how to enforce them effectively. You’ll also learn when to use a map policy template, how map pricing monitoring works, and what to do if you encounter a map price violation — so your brand can thrive with a stronger reseller program.
A MAP pricing policy is a set of guidelines from a brand that defines the lowest price resellers can advertise a product. It does not restrict the actual selling price — retailers may sell lower privately, but public ads (websites, emails, print) must respect the minimum advertised price.
For clarity and consistency, brands often start with a map policy template to outline expectations and avoid ambiguity.
A strong map pricing policy helps stabilize markets and strengthen reseller partnerships.
In short, a map pricing policy is both a revenue protection tool and a marketing asset that communicates fairness and professionalism across your reseller network.
Even though a MAP pricing policy seems straightforward, there are common misunderstandings that can cause compliance or legal issues.
A map policy must be unilateral — a statement from the manufacturer, not a two-way agreement with resellers. Presenting it as an agreement risks being viewed as price-fixing, which violates antitrust laws.
Drafting a map policy template is only step one. Without consistent map pricing monitoring, enforcement, and consequences for violations, even the best-written policy won’t protect your brand.
Manual tracking (e.g., searching SKUs online) is inefficient and risks missing a map price violation, allowing discounting to spread and damage your reseller relationships. Automated map price monitoring ensures violations are detected, documented, and enforced consistently — giving the policy credibility.
Every policy should define enforcement steps clearly. A typical process includes:
The key is consistency. Uneven enforcement weakens your map pricing policy and can create perceptions of favoritism or legal risk.
A common question is whether you need a MAP pricing policy or an MSRP — or both. While they’re often mentioned together, they serve different purposes.
The manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) is the price a brand recommends resellers sell a product for — often called the “sticker price.” Dealers may sell above or below MSRP depending on demand, but it’s only a guideline, not enforceable.
MSRP = Suggested selling price
MAP policy = Minimum advertised priceMSRP helps customers understand value, while a map pricing policy prevents undercutting in ads and protects reseller margins. Together, they create a balanced pricing structure that maintains brand integrity.
Consistent use of both MAP and MSRP, supported by active map pricing monitoring, strengthens brand reputation and retailer profitability.
Yes — brands often implement both without risk of price-fixing. The key is clear communication: MSRP is a recommendation, while a MAP policy is a unilateral advertising standard.
Because manual tracking can miss a single map price violation, automated map price monitoring is critical. TrackStreet’s solution monitors 24/7, enforces fairly, and ensures compliance without exposing brands to antitrust risks.
At first glance, a MAP pricing policy and a unilateral pricing policy (UPP) may seem similar, but they differ in scope and enforcement.
With UPP, brands don’t need to distinguish between advertising and selling prices. The policy extends across sales channels — websites, marketplaces like Amazon and eBay, in-cart pricing, physical stores, and print ads.
A MAP pricing policy usually limits consequences to actions like withholding co-op ad funds. UPPs may give manufacturers broader legal options, including cutting off inventory supply to violators.
Confusion is common. Some businesses ask for a map pricing policy when they actually need a UPP, while others misuse a map policy template, re-labeling it as UPP, and risk antitrust violations.The right choice depends on your goals. Whether MAP, UPP, or a hybrid approach, your strategy should be legally sound and aligned with reseller relationships. Brand protection experts can help identify the best fit for your business and ensure compliance.
Implementing a MAP pricing policy can be complex, and many brands make avoidable mistakes. Here are the most common pitfalls and how to prevent them.
1. Outsourcing Enforcement to Distributors
Distributors should help control product access, but they aren’t responsible for map pricing monitoring or compliance.
What to do instead
Your company must own enforcement. Distributor agreements should require them to:
2. Not Enforcing In-Cart Pricing
Some manufacturers assume in-cart pricing falls outside of MAP rules. But courts have confirmed that in-cart pricing is still advertising since customers see it before checkout.
What to do instead
Extend your map pricing policy to cover in-cart pricing if desired. A clear map policy template ensures resellers know what’s expected. TrackStreet’s flexible tools allow you to customize this.
3. Relying on Verbal MAP Policies
Verbal-only rules invite risk:
What to do instead
Draft a clear, written map policy template and enforce it consistently.
4. Failing to Implement a Monitoring System
Even well-written map policies fail without enforcement. Manual checks miss violations, which can hurt reseller trust and brand value.
What to do instead
Use automated map price monitoring software to detect and document every map price violation. Automation ensures fairness, consistency, and scalability.
The best systems go beyond basic map pricing monitoring. Look for:
The result: your MAPGap™ shrinks, your Average Unit Retail (AUR) rises, and your brand protection delivers measurable ROI.
A well-structured MAP pricing policy protects your brand, reseller margins, and market reputation — but drafting a policy is only the beginning. Real success requires consistent enforcement, scalable map pricing monitoring, and the right tools.TrackStreet goes beyond basic map policy templates and manual checks. Our platform delivers:
Backed by brand protection experts, TrackStreet helps you move from reactive enforcement to proactive brand protection.
Schedule a consultation today and see how TrackStreet can help you enforce map policies with confidence.
Q: What is a MAP policy?
A: A MAP policy, short for minimum advertised price policy, is a unilateral guideline set by a manufacturer that dictates the lowest price resellers can advertise a product for. It does not control the final selling price but ensures consistent advertised pricing across channels.
Q: What is the definition of MAP pricing?
A: MAP pricing, or minimum advertised price, is the lowest price a reseller is allowed to publicly advertise a product. While resellers can sometimes sell below that amount in private transactions, they must advertise at or above the MAP level.
Q: How does a MAP pricing policy benefit my brand?
A: A strong MAP policy helps maintain price consistency, protects brand reputation, prevents margin erosion, and builds trust with both online and brick-and-mortar resellers.
Q: Can I use a MAP policy template?
A: Yes. A map policy template can be a useful starting point, but every brand should customize it to their distribution model, sales channels, and enforcement process to ensure it is legally sound and effective.
Q: What happens if a reseller violates MAP pricing?
A: A map price violation typically triggers a series of enforcement steps, such as warning notices, suspension of advertising support, or even removal from the authorized reseller list. Consistent enforcement is essential for credibility and compliance.
More Insights